Claude vs GPT vs Gemini, 2026

Five-axis comparison of the three flagship LLM families: coding, cost, speed, vision, context window.

Radar chart comparing Claude Opus 4.7, GPT-5 Turbo, and Gemini 2.5 Pro on five normalized 0-to-10 axes: coding, cost per million tokens, response speed, vision and multimodal, and context window. Claude leads on coding, GPT leads on speed, Gemini leads on context window and multimodal. — Figure: Claude vs GPT vs Gemini — 2026 Comparison Radar. SVG is open under CC BY 4.0 — credit claude-api-cookbook.vercel.app.

Claude Opus 4.7 wins coding and tool-use benchmarks; cost-competitive with prompt caching.
GPT-5 Turbo wins raw response speed and ecosystem maturity.
Gemini 2.5 Pro wins on context window (2M+) and native multimodal.

Pick by workload, not brand: code review and structured agents favor Claude; ultra-fast chat favors GPT; massive-context summarization favors Gemini.

Related pages

Cost Calculator → Prompt-Pricing Recommender → Diff Summarizer → Skills Browser →